McCarthy’s Law #160

CFD _160 Panel 3

Recently, Indianapolis House member Bob Benhing (do I even need to add the political party designation?) filed a bill which was, for all intents and purposes, a reaction to the statewide announcement that graduation rates had increased…quite a lot, actually.

McCarthy's Law 160

Benhing’s specific beef is with the state’s widespread use of waivers which allow kids who fail what was once called the ISTEP (now euphemistically called the ECA or “End of Course Assessment”) to still earn a diploma with the help of teacher recommendations, grades, and other evidence which demonstrates competence.  Benhing’s assertion is that, without the glut of waivers, Indiana’s graduation rate would have been below 80% instead of the almost 86% reported in 2011.

On the one hand, let’s be fair.  If we’re talking about setting the bar high and expecting people to meet a set of standards.  From this point-of-view, all the kids who work hard and earn stellar GPA’s have the right to walk across the podium, and take their diploma knowing that they achieved something that didn’t come easy.  The argument from this side is that, watching kids who “under-performed” also earn a diploma diminishes, and maybe even cheapens, the entire effort.  If that sounds a little too hyperbolic (something I get accused of being all the time for some strange reason), then it at the very least seems to undermine the point of even spending the money on a standardized test to begin with.

I also see Benhing’s point from this angle, too: Who among us would want to be rescued from a Pakistani terrorist compound by a group of Navy Seals with a 98% graduation rate?  Who would want to watch an NFL or MLB team that kept almost 100% of the players who tried out for the squads?  Remember what happened to the pitching in the MLB every time the league expanded?  Would Harvard be Harvard if it accepted everyone who applied?  Would Congress be what it is if we just accepted everybody who wanted to serve there…?  Okay…that last one was a bad analogy, but you get Benhing’s point…thus far.

All of this, thus far, makes great sense, and raises incredibly valid points.  As an AP teacher, specifically I love the idea of setting a high marker and watching people epically struggle along the order of An Officer and a Gentleman to reach it (however, I cannot quite set that bar as high as I wish because of the time limitations of the seven-period day which I mentioned recently in this post).

All of this is a great argument when we’re talking about watching professional athletes, or praying for salvation from elite Special Forces.

But we’re talking about kids, here.  Kids.

34642_1340443306283_1426582_n

Speaking at our 2010 graduation ceremony.

And that, my friends, is where the neat and tidy argument hits a major snag.

Let me start with a former student of mine, “Vince” who was not in my AP classes, not in my second-tier honors classes, either.  He was in the class we called “regular” English (a term I have avoid using because it feels like I’m talking about those kids as if they’re a type of gasoline).  He wasn’t the most prolific writer, and he didn’t hit the ball out of the park as a math student, either.  But one talent that kid has was working with motors.  Vince could rebuild an engine with a butter-knife, some chewing gum, and shoelace.  It was enough to make MacGyver jealous.  Once, when one of the cars he was working on lost all five forward gears, he drove it home, half a mile, in reverse.  By the modern definition of the “model” student, Vince is simply not one.  But, if Vince went to school twenty or thirty years ago, no one would have questioned his right to walk across that stage.

That’s the problem I have with this “bar” that we’ve created for graduates, today.  In Vince’s class, I had a dozen kids who could write as well as a neighboring DePauw upper-classman, but I couldn’t think of a second kid at all who could do the things Vince could to an automobile.  In the real world, we all have to take the car to the shop, but how many of us find ourselves needing to take a manuscript to a “writing mechanic”?

Another concern is the nearly pernicious message we’re sending to kids as they move through the system.  We’re going to take a kid who has advanced every grade for a dozen years, and now, just at the end, we’re suddenly going to say, “Sorry, you’re not good enough to be a part of society?”  If we take a young man, one with special needs, one who will never (let’s be honest, here) be responsible for the coolant system in a nuclear reactor, and we say, “You can’t participate in real life…” how does that help society?

So, when it comes to the matter of high school graduation rates, we’re stuck with two conflicting philosophies:  Either we set the bar rigidly high and tell those who fail, “too bad,” or we decide that everyone comes in at different levels with different skill sets, and we make them better at what they are naturally inclined to do.

Are schools information and skill factories designed to produce “products” of equal quality? Or are school places where adults, trained to deal with the adolescent mind, help children from all socio-economic backgrounds adapt to the transition to adulthood, so that they begin the real learning that takes place in adult life?  It’s increasingly clear that people like Benhing, and the ALEC-funded/driven cabal which pays for their world-view, are not really that interested in kids, or in actual “schooling” for that matter.  And even those among them who do care about the quality of schools, must not be aware of how their passions are being exploited by those who writing their agenda for them.

About these ads

2 thoughts on “McCarthy’s Law #160

  1. Awesome post. I teach Spanish in lovely Detroit and have come across the same systems. We have had a big problem with students being socially promoted (some without the ability to read a sentence or add single-digit numbers), but many of them have gone into the Vocational Tech programs (VoTech) and are doing amazing. And to be honest, a plumber or an electrician (or auto-mechanic) is going to earn a lot more money here than a banker. If that’s what they want to do, and they’re good at it and motivated towards that goal, let them do it.

    Yes, I do think everyone should have the chance to go to college (and it is somewhat taken away from some of the kids here because they weren’t adequately prepared), but if they honestly want to be a mechanic or a beautician, it’s part of my job to prepare them for the real world as part of that industry. Part of that is a high school diploma, which your awesome representative seems to want to deny kids because they can’t take a test. Nope, you didn’t need to tell his party, we have the same issues with them here.

  2. I’m simply curious- what do they gain in making these tests? Why do they insist on making us jump through these hoops? It isn’t helping anyone at all. Well, maybe testing companies- but that surely can’t be lucrative enough carry much political weight… right?

    This caught my attention because I am a bit of a headcase. I’m just one of those people who have a hard time ‘getting off the ground’, so to speak… Or rather, just getting off of my fat caboose. I have never learned to organize and focus myself, which I sincerely think is the most important thing needed to live with any semblance of dignity in this world. Funnily enough, though, I am extremely good at taking tests; I don’t even have to study for the accursed things. I don’t know if this is what I’ve been taught at school, or just a quirk of mine, but in all honesty I rather have the ability to study. In all my years of school, I’ve learned that all I need to do is just kick back and steer by the seat of my pants; and that just won’t do. I passed my finals this year with ease- and I hardly paid a bit of attention in most of my classes. In one of them, I wasn’t even awake half the time, for the love of Mike. All it has become about is grades, tests, and more labels to stick on students and teachers. God, why can’t it just be about straight-up learning anymore? Won’t that be more beneficial to America?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s